Karnataka High Court Halts Proceedings Against Student in Egg-Throwing Case

thelawmonitor
3 Min Read
Karnataka High Court Halts Proceedings Against Student in Egg-Throwing Case

The Karnataka High Court has issued an interim order to pause criminal proceedings against an engineering student accused of participating in an egg-throwing incident targeting Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA BP Harish. The event took place during protests related to the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). Presiding over the matter, Justice M. Nagaprasanna temporarily halted further legal actions against the student.

Incident Details and Context

The alleged incident occurred last month outside the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) office in Bengaluru. BP Harish, a Member of the Legislative Assembly, was present to join a BJP protest. This demonstration aimed to counter a Congress-led protest in Delhi, spearheaded by Rahul Gandhi, against alleged exam paper leaks. However, Harish found himself isolated when other BJP leaders were detained by the police on their way to the event.

As tensions escalated, Harish was escorted away by law enforcement, during which eggs were reportedly thrown in his direction. Subsequently, nine individuals, including a student named Punya C Naik, were implicated in a criminal complaint filed by the BJP leader.

The charges against Naik and others involve several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), including Section 115(2) for causing hurt, Section 118(1) for using dangerous means, Section 126(2) for wrongful restraint, and Section 190 for unlawful assembly. In response, Naik approached the High Court to request the dismissal of the case.

Representing Naik, Advocate Shathabish Shivanna argued that the charges stemmed from political pressure rather than factual evidence. Shivanna insisted that Naik was arbitrarily detained among a group of students and had intended only to peacefully protest against the alleged police misconduct in Delhi’s Jantar Mantar during NEET-related demonstrations.

Court’s Response and Next Steps

After reviewing the initial arguments, the Court sought a response from the State while granting Naik interim relief. This move temporarily suspends the criminal proceedings, providing Naik with a reprieve. Advocates Rithvik Balanagraj B and Milton Herburt MM also represented the student during the proceedings.

The High Court’s decision highlights the ongoing legal controversies surrounding political protests and the impact of judicial intervention in politically sensitive cases.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *