Supreme Court Commends Progress on CCTV Installation in Police Stations
The Supreme Court of India has recognized the substantial progress made in installing CCTV cameras in police stations nationwide. However, the Court raised concerns regarding the sustainability of government funding for the initiative in certain states. This development was discussed in the case In Re: Lack of functional CCTVs in Police Stations.
Bench Reviews Installation Progress
The Bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, was briefed by Amicus Curiae Siddharth Dave, who submitted a status report after a meeting with the Union government. Dave acknowledged the significant progress, yet highlighted potential funding challenges, especially in Assam, where the funding scheme is due to expire in December. He also noted that some states are struggling to secure additional funds.
Funding and Maintenance Concerns
The Court emphasized that the current scheme funds cannot be used for the maintenance of CCTV cameras, which may deter states from ensuring the long-term functionality of these cameras. It was noted that Himachal Pradesh is the only state that received funds so far, and commendable work has been done there.
Amicus Curiae’s Contribution
Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta praised Siddharth Dave for his efforts, stating, “Things have been moving. In this matter, things are moving very well. We must give credit to Mr. Dave. Things have taken a positive turn.”
Background: Suo Motu Case on CCTV Implementation
The Supreme Court had initiated a suo motu case to address the absence of functional CCTV cameras in police stations across India. This follows the Court’s 2020 ruling in Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, which mandated the installation of night vision and audio recording CCTV cameras in every police station and in offices of central agencies such as the CBI, NIA, ED, and NCB.
More Read
The Court took up the current proceedings after reports of 11 custodial deaths in Rajasthan over eight months, having previously criticized several states and the Union government for not filing compliance affidavits.
Future Considerations and Related Cases
The Bench has identified two critical issues: the extension of funding schemes for CCTV installation and ensuring their long-term maintenance. The Court recorded the submission of the amicus report dated July 21, following a meeting with the Union government. The Additional Solicitor General has been given two weeks to respond to the suggestions and recommendations in the report.
The case will continue to be heard in August. Additionally, the Delhi High Court is addressing a related case where a petitioner has pointed out the absence of CCTV cameras at a Crime Branch office in the city, despite the Supreme Court’s directives.
