The Allahabad High Court has raised concerns about the Uttar Pradesh government’s alleged misuse of the UP Control of Goondas Act, 1970. Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, while adjudicating the case of Zahid Ali v State of UP and 4 Others, criticized the government for persistently using the Act as an oppressive tool, despite prior judicial warnings against such practices.
Background of the Case
Zahid Ali was declared a ‘Goonda’ by the District Magistrate of Gonda and was ordered to be externed from the district for six months. This decision was recently overturned by the High Court, which found the grounds for such action to be inadequate. Justice Vidyarthi emphasized that the Goonda Act is meant to control genuine public disorder and should be applied sparingly in clear-cut cases.
Judicial Observations
The court highlighted that the involvement in a case where Ali was already acquitted should not be used to label him a ‘Goonda.’ The bench asserted that a person’s involvement in a criminal case, particularly after acquittal, cannot justify such a declaration. Furthermore, it was noted that no valid allegations were made suggesting that Ali posed a threat to public order.
Critique of Administrative Actions
The court acknowledged that Ali had not initially informed the District Magistrate about his acquittal. However, it pointed out that the police were aware of this fact and should not have misrepresented his status. The court criticized the confirmation of the District Magistrate’s order by the Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, who did not adequately consider Ali’s defense during the appeal process.
Legal Implications
Justice Vidyarthi concluded that Ali’s involvement in a single criminal case from 2020 did not establish a habitual pattern of criminal behavior necessary for a ‘Goonda’ declaration. The court found a significant time lapse between the incident in 2020 and the declaration in 2026, indicating no reasonable nexus.
More Read
Ultimately, the court quashed the District Magistrate’s and Commissioner’s orders against Ali, underscoring the need for the Goonda Act to be invoked only in appropriate circumstances. Advocate Kunwar Bahadur Singh represented Ali, while Additional Government Advocate Ravi Srivastava appeared for the State.
