Introduction
In a recent address, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant addressed the frequent criticisms directed at the Supreme Court Collegium. He highlighted that these criticisms often come from individuals lacking an understanding of the judiciary’s inner workings, the evolution of the Collegium, and the criteria it employs in recommending judges.
Collegium’s Evaluation Process
Speaking at a felicitation event organized by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) for the newly appointed Supreme Court Justices Sheel Nagu, Shree Chandrashekhar, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Arun Palli, and V Mohana, CJI Kant explained the meticulous process the Collegium follows. The criteria include an emphasis on inclusivity and diversity, a judge’s professional performance, tenure, past roles, and comprehensive career achievements.
Objective Decision-Making
CJI Kant expressed gratitude towards the Collegium for its objective and merit-driven approach in recommending the five judges for elevation. He conveyed his confidence in their abilities to excel and set exemplary standards for the institution, with the support of the Supreme Court Bar.
The Role of the Supreme Court Bar
Highlighting the positive relationship between the Bar and the Bench, CJI Kant lauded the SCBA, particularly acknowledging the conventions emphasized by SCBA President Vikas Singh. He noted the rarity of strikes and the cordial interactions within the Supreme Court compared to other courts. CJI Kant also praised the Bar’s ability to deliver effective assistance swiftly and the Bench’s adeptness at understanding complex issues quickly.
Responsibilities of Newly Appointed Judges
CJI Kant reminded the newly appointed justices of the significant responsibility that comes with their elevation to the Supreme Court, emphasizing the need to uphold the public’s trust. He noted that the Supreme Court’s role transcends resolving civil and criminal cases; it is also pivotal in developing constitutional jurisprudence.
More Read
Conclusion
Concluding his speech, CJI Kant expressed his belief in the newly appointed judges’ capability to uphold their responsibilities and continue contributing positively to the judiciary’s mission. The ceremony ended on a note of optimism and commitment to excellence in the judiciary.
