The Supreme Court of India has imposed a penalty of ₹3 lakh each on the comedian and YouTuber Samay Raina and four others for failing to comply with court directives related to their show, which was criticized for making insensitive comments about individuals with disabilities.
Background and Court Orders
On Tuesday, the Bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and comprising Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, ruled on this matter. The court was informed that Raina did not include people with disabilities in his performances, despite previous court orders mandating such inclusion.
“It appears that Samay Raina has disregarded the court’s authority by flouting its directives. Additionally, there are discrepancies with the affidavits submitted,” the court stated. Consequently, the court imposed a fine of ₹3 lakh, to be paid within two weeks.
The Case Against Raina
The petition was filed by Cure SMA India Foundation, alleging that Raina made offensive remarks regarding the expense of treating Spinal Muscular Atrophy and mocked an individual with a disability. The petition sought regulations on the broadcast of online content, arguing it violated the dignity and right to life of people with disabilities.
In November 2025, the court had instructed Raina and fellow comedians to organize at least two events per month to raise funds for disability treatment. They were also to invite individuals with disabilities to participate in their shows.
Petitioner’s Claims and Court’s Response
During the hearing, Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, representing the petitioner, asserted that Raina did not reach out to them or involve disabled individuals in his performances. The court remarked, “You should have invited Ms. Aparajita Singh’s client for the show. Your actions suggest an attempt to evade accountability.”
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also criticized Raina’s behavior, pointing out his use of superstitious symbols like “Nimbu-Mirchi” (lemon and chili) on stage, questioning, “Our youth deserves better role models.”
Raina’s Defense and Final Judgment
Raina’s legal representative argued that ₹9 lakh had been raised through the shows for the benefit of people with disabilities. However, Aparajita Singh countered, “We do not seek their money.” Justice Bagchi emphasized, “Your shows celebrate humor and happiness, yet seem to overlook the fundamental right to dignity.”
More Read
The judges highlighted the importance of respect in public life, with CJI Kant noting, “Public figures like artists must show respect to others, as it reflects well on their character.”
Despite Raina’s counsel asserting that people with disabilities were invited to the shows, the court found non-compliance with its earlier directives regrettable and insufficient. CJI Kant expressed disappointment, stating, “We believed you would act responsibly, but nothing has changed.”
Ultimately, the court imposed a reduced fine of ₹3 lakh per individual, warning of a potential increase to ₹30 lakh for continued non-compliance. The court ordered adherence to its prior instructions.
