The Punjab and Haryana High Court has announced plans to strengthen its security protocols following an attack on Advocate Gagandeep Jammu, a former secretary of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association. On Thursday, the court’s Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry, emphasized the need for improved security measures and called upon the Bar Association to formalize their suggestions through a resolution. The court assured that any recommendations would be promptly implemented.
Call for Cooperation from Lawyers
Chief Justice Nagu urged lawyers to cooperate with the security procedures, specifically regarding frisking measures on court premises. He stated, “Whenever frisking of a lawyer takes place, you should not resist. That is my request to all of you.” This appeal aims to ensure a seamless implementation of enhanced security protocols.
Legal Proceedings Following the Attack
The attack on Advocate Jammu occurred on May 19, when an unidentified assailant opened fire on him, raising significant concerns about the safety of legal professionals. In response, Mohali police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, following Jammu’s complaint. Subsequently, the court directed the Chandigarh Police to bolster security for Jammu.
Security Concerns and SOP Consideration
On May 20, several lawyers voiced their concerns about security at the court, prompting discussions about issuing a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to address incidents involving attacks on lawyers. The High Court Bar Association also submitted a representation to Chief Justice Nagu, requesting directives for enhanced security measures for advocates.
Monitoring the Investigation
The court reviewed a status report from the State of Punjab regarding the investigation into the attack on Jammu. The court expressed its intention to monitor the investigation, ordering a fresh report by May 25. The court’s proactive stance underscores its commitment to ensuring the safety of legal professionals.
More Read
Challenges with Existing Security Infrastructure
During the hearing, several lawyers criticized the existing security system at the High Court, describing it as outdated and insufficient. One counsel remarked, “The security system at the entrance is not even as good as the old system at the Supreme Court. It is so bad and outdated.” In response, the court urged the Bar Association to pass a resolution aimed at strengthening the security infrastructure.
