Madras High Court Decision on Sudha Kongara’s Plea
In a significant ruling on Friday, the Madras High Court declined the request for interim relief by filmmaker Sudha Kongara, who sought to prevent the release of the Tamil movie Idhayam Murali until alleged outstanding dues were settled by the producer. The case, titled Sudha Kongara Vs Dawn Pictures, was presided over by Justice K Kumaresh Babu.
Justice Babu appointed an arbitrator to resolve the financial dispute between Kongara and the production company, Dawn Pictures. The filmmaker approached the court under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, arguing that Dawn Pictures owed her ₹8.39 crore for her work in a previous film, Parasakthi.
Allegations of Unpaid Dues
Kongara claimed that her total due under the agreement was ₹15 crore, excluding GST, which increased the total to ₹17.70 crore. With only ₹9.31 crore paid, she insisted that ₹8.39 crore remained unpaid. Seeking interim protection, Kongara argued that Dawn Pictures should be restrained from releasing Idhayam Murali without settling the alleged dues.
Her legal team argued that the producer lacked substantial assets, and a potential arbitral award in her favor could be difficult to enforce post-release. They contended that the rights to the screenplay and related work of Parasakthi were conditional upon full payment, implying that Dawn Pictures could not exploit the work without fulfilling the contractual obligations.
Producer’s Defense
Opposing Kongara’s plea, Dawn Pictures, represented by Senior Advocate Aravind Pandian, contended that previous agreements with 2D Entertainment and Akra Entertainment (the former name of Dawn Pictures) confirmed that Kongara had already received payments in full settlement. The producer claimed that a 2021 agreement with 2D Entertainment, terminated in December 2024, acknowledged Kongara’s receipt of ₹4.12 crore for various contributions, including story, script, screenplay, dialogues, and direction.
More Read
Earlier, on June 30, the Court had temporarily prohibited the satellite release of Parasakthi until July 8, requesting a counter-argument from Dawn Pictures regarding Kongara’s claims. Advocates Nityesh Natraj and Vaibhav Venkatesh represented Kongara in court.
This case underscores the complexities surrounding contractual disputes in the film industry, highlighting the balance courts must maintain between enforcing agreements and ensuring fair compensation for creative contributions.
