Introduction
The General Counsels’ Association of India (GCAI) has formally requested the Bar Council of India (BCI) to acknowledge general counsel and in-house legal professionals as “legal practitioners.” This plea is in response to the Draft Advocates (Amendment) Bill, 2026, which currently does not extend this recognition to lawyers working within corporate, public, or joint-sector organizations.
Proposed Amendments to BCI Rules
The GCAI has called for amendments to Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules. This would ensure that advocates do not lose their professional standing when they enter full-time salaried positions. “GCAI supports the initiative to formally recognize and register Indian law firms. If institutional law firms are recognized, the same principle should apply to advocates within the corporate sector,” stated a GCAI press release dated July 21, submitted by co-founder Sanjeev Gemawat.
Broadening the Definition of Legal Practitioners
The draft Bill aims to recognize those employed in governmental roles as legal practitioners. The GCAI has suggested adding “private sector, public sector, or joint sector organization” to this definition. The Association argues that legal work for government organizations should not be treated differently from equivalent work in corporate settings, such as companies, banks, and other institutional employers.
Nature of Legal Functions
According to the GCAI, the critical factor should be the professional nature of the functions performed. Whether an individual is adequately qualified and actively engaged in legal work should determine their status as a legal practitioner. The Association has proposed a broader definition that includes advocates and law graduates, whether or not enrolled with a State Bar Council, who engage in legal advisory, transactional, regulatory, compliance, arbitration, dispute resolution, and governance functions.
Amendments to the Advocates Act
GCAI has suggested modifications to Section 29 of the Advocates Act, which currently designates advocates as the only class entitled to practice law. They propose that the term “legal practitioners” should replace “advocates” to include in-house lawyers. This change would allow in-house lawyers to enroll or renew enrollment certificates that were surrendered upon accepting full-time employment, counting their employment period as legal practice.
More Read
Impact on Legal Practice
The proposal also necessitates changes to Section 33, which outlines the right to practice before courts and authorities. Furthermore, GCAI has requested the harmonization of Rule 49, arguing that an advocate should retain professional recognition even in full-time employment, provided their primary duties involve legitimate legal work.
Professional Development Opportunities
Recognizing in-house legal practice could open up structured employment and professional development avenues for young advocates in various sectors, including startups, banks, and public enterprises. To facilitate these changes, GCAI has proposed establishing a BCI-industry working group to draft rules and standards for in-house legal professionals.
