Complex Legal Representation in Lohagad Fort Murder Case
In a twist of events surrounding the Lohagad Fort murder case, confusion has arisen over the legal representation of the accused, 20-year-old Siya Goyal. Two attorneys have now emerged, each claiming to represent her interests in court. The case, which has captured public attention, involves the alleged murder of Pune-based realtor Ketan Agarwal, who reportedly fell to his death from Lohagad Fort on June 18.
Disputed Legal Notices and Claims
Advocate Aashuutosh Srivastava has taken legal steps by issuing a ₹10 crore notice to Sahil Goyal, Siya’s brother. This notice addresses Sahil’s public assertion made on June 29, claiming that Srivastava was not appointed by the family to represent Siya. Srivastava contends that this statement is misleading and has tarnished his professional reputation.
According to Srivastava, Siya Goyal executed ‘vakalatnamas’ on June 25, formally designating him and his team as her legal representatives in both the magistrate court in Wadgaon Mawal, Pune, and the Bombay High Court. These documents, Srivastava claims, have been officially acknowledged by the respective courts.
Conflicting Statements and Legal Proceedings
Conversely, Advocate Vipul Dushing asserts that he was hired by the Goyal family to defend Siya. Dushing claims that during the remand hearing on June 29, Siya herself confirmed to the magistrate that Dushing was the sole lawyer she engaged.
The disagreement intensified following Sahil’s media statement, which prompted a public dispute over Siya’s legal representation. Srivastava defended his position in a video released to media outlets, emphasizing that all relevant legal documents were signed by Siya and filed in court.
Srivastava expressed his concerns over what he described as defamatory remarks by Sahil, which he asserts unjustly target the legal profession. He urged Sahil to issue an apology and retract his statement, highlighting that Siya, as an adult, has the autonomy to appoint legal counsel of her choice.
Current Status and Legal Implications
The Lohagad Fort murder case continues to unfold under the scrutiny of the Lonavala Rural Police. As the remand proceedings progress in the magistrate court, the question of who legitimately represents Siya Goyal remains a contentious issue. The conflict not only complicates the legal process but also underscores the significant role of legal representation in high-profile cases.
