The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Palakkad, Kerala, has recently mandated that AirAsia India Limited compensate a farmer with ₹90,750. This ruling comes after a flight delay led to the damage of a rare plant being transported by the farmer, resulting in financial loss and distress. The case, Abdul Azeez C v Air Asia India Limited, was adjudicated by a bench comprising President Vinay Menon V and members Vidya A and Krishnankutty NK.
Details of the Case
The complainant, a farmer from Palakkad involved in cultivating and researching hybrid fruit species, filed a complaint against the airline. The Commission ruled that the airline was responsible for both the financial setback and mental distress experienced by the farmer. The order stated, “It is clear that we accept the complainant has suffered financial loss and mental agony due to the deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party and is bound to compensate the complainant for that.”
In August 2025, the farmer embarked on a journey from Kochi to Indonesia via Kuala Lumpur, aiming to acquire a hybrid jackfruit sapling for his farm. Unfortunately, the return trip was marred by a significant delay in the AirAsia flight from Medan-Kualanamu to Kuala Lumpur, causing him to miss a connecting flight to Kochi despite having a layover exceeding three hours.
Airline’s Lack of Assistance
Upon reaching Kuala Lumpur, the farmer sought help from airline officials to arrange an alternative flight. He even indicated a willingness to cover additional costs due to the delicate nature of the sapling he was carrying. However, he was allegedly told that the next flight to Kochi would be available only after three days. The farmer later managed to book a seat on another AirAsia flight the following day, contradicting the airline’s earlier information.
The delay and insufficient assistance caused significant damage to the sapling, rendering it unusable. This not only nullified the purpose of the trip but also resulted in financial loss, including extra travel and accommodation expenses. Despite being duly notified, AirAsia did not respond or appear before the Commission, leading to an ex parte proceeding.
More Read
Commission’s Verdict
After reviewing the documentary evidence, such as flight tickets and travel records, the Commission concluded that the delay and the airline’s failure to assist constituted a deficiency in service. Consequently, the airline was ordered to refund ₹30,750 for the ticket fare, pay ₹25,000 for travel and accommodation expenses, and award ₹25,000 as compensation for service deficiency, along with ₹10,000 for litigation costs.
The Commission further stipulated that the total amount must be paid within 45 days. Failure to comply would result in an additional liability of ₹500 per month until full payment. The farmer was represented by Nyayashraya Associates, with advocates Jeevan John, Sidhya Sasidharan, and Aravind standing for him.
