The Delhi High Court recently dismissed requests for re-polling in the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) elections. A Division Bench comprising Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Tejas Karia deliberated on petitions that alleged irregularities in the electoral process. Although the Court acknowledged the maintainability of these petitions, it refrained from ordering a re-poll.
The Bench, however, issued specific directives, which are to be published on the Court’s website along with a comprehensive judgment in the near future. “We have found the petitions maintainable but see no grounds for conducting a re-poll. Certain directions have been issued,” the Court stated in its order. The detailed judgment is anticipated soon.
Judicial Proceedings and Arguments
The decision was rendered amidst a series of petitions challenging the integrity of the BCD elections. The Bench had reserved its judgment on June 1 after conducting hearings over three consecutive days, including the weekend. Representing the petitioners were advocates Rajiv Khosla, Shobha Gupta, Raman Gandhi, Anushka Arora, Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Vaibhav Jain, Nina Gupta, and Rudra Vikram Singh, while T Singhdev, Priya Hingorani, Sunil Mittal, and Peyoosh Kalra appeared for the respondents.
In a noteworthy move, the Court scrutinized video recordings of the vote-counting process to assess the claims of electoral misconduct. The Supreme Court had previously entrusted the Delhi High Court’s special bench with these matters following its May 18 order. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi had transferred the petitions to the High Court, halting the counting of ballot papers until the verdict was reached.
Controversies and Legal Actions
The BCD elections, conducted in February under the supervision of retired Justice Talwant Singh, were embroiled in controversy. Allegations of Model Code of Conduct violations led to the summary suspension of 67 candidates, including two Senior Advocates, on February 22. Notices were issued to 79 lawyers; however, the suspensions of 63 candidates were lifted the next day after they provided satisfactory explanations.
More Read
Further turmoil ensued when a lawyer was placed under interim suspension by the Bar Council of India for alleged misconduct involving Justice Talwant Singh. The lawyer was accused of attempting to physically confront Justice Singh, inciting a group of lawyers, and making inflammatory statements against the election authorities during an inspection for election rule violations.
Subsequently, the BCD took disciplinary action against former President of the Delhi High Court Bar Association, Rajiv Khosla, and nine other lawyers for allegedly “manhandling, pushing, and abusing” election officials. On May 2, Justice Singh confidentially communicated with the Supreme Court regarding the ongoing election issues. The High Court’s recent hearings were a continuation of the legal challenges concerning alleged electoral discrepancies.
