Delhi High Court’s Interim Order Against Meesho for Trademark Violation
In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court issued an interim order mandating the e-commerce platform Meesho to remove listings of products that closely resemble those of Jockey, the well-known American undergarment and apparel brand. The court’s decision, dated May 29, came after Justice Jyoti Singh determined that Jockey had established a prima facie case of trademark infringement.
Case Findings and Court Rationale
Justice Jyoti Singh’s ruling emphasized that the contested trademarks bore a striking similarity to Jockey’s registered trademark. The judge noted, “The impugned marks are prima facie deceptively similar to JOCKEY, the registered trademark of the Plaintiff (Jockey) and are being used by the Defendants for identical products. The consumer base and trade channels being common, likelihood of confusion cannot be ruled out.”
Background of the Trademark Dispute
The legal battle began when Jockey discovered in January that certain products bearing names like “JOYKE”, “JOYEBEE”, “JOYESS”, and “JOJOKE” were being sold on Meesho and other online platforms. Jockey’s private investigation uncovered that one of the infringing entities was even attempting to secure trademark registration for these names. Despite receiving a cease-and-desist letter, the infringing company continued its activities, prompting Jockey to seek judicial intervention.
Court’s Directives to Meesho
The court, considering the evidence presented by Jockey, granted an ex parte interim injunction. This injunction prevents the infringing companies from manufacturing, marketing, or selling products that misuse Jockey’s trademark. Furthermore, the court directed Meesho to disable the URLs for these infringing products within 36 hours of receiving the court order.
Additional Compliance Requirements for Meesho
In addition to removing the infringing listings, Meesho is required to furnish detailed information about the infringing parties. The court instructed Meesho to provide Know Your Customer (KYC) details, registered addresses, mobile numbers, UPI details, transaction records, and IP logs of the offending companies within four weeks from the date of the order.
More Read
Next Steps and Legal Representation
The court scheduled the next hearing for September 24. Advocates Saif Khan, Shobhit Agrawal, and Diya Viswanath represented Jockey in this matter. This order marks a crucial step in protecting Jockey’s brand identity and enforcing trademark laws in the digital marketplace.
