Supreme Court Raises Alarm Over Misuse of POCSO Act
The Supreme Court of India recently expressed significant concern regarding a rising trend where estranged wives are allegedly misusing the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) to file false cases against husbands and their families during matrimonial disputes. The bench, comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, emphasized the need for courts to remain vigilant in identifying such trends.
Case Overview
The court made these observations while quashing a case against a man and his relatives. It found that the complaint seemed orchestrated to implicate the accused amidst a prolonged matrimonial battle between the child’s parents. The court cautioned that children are increasingly being drawn into these disputes, with allegations often lacking substantiation and primarily intended to settle personal scores.
Justice Nagarathna and Justice Bhuyan highlighted the issue, stating, “A child is often used by her mother against her father, making false and vexatious complaints to exact revenge or obtain a higher monetary settlement.” They stressed the importance of examining such allegations carefully, especially when they arise from ongoing matrimonial disputes filled with pre-existing animosity.
Legal Implications and Court’s Advisory
The Supreme Court advised that courts should exercise extreme caution before acknowledging complaints invoking serious charges like rape, particularly in cases where matrimonial litigation has been extensive. Such scenarios can lead to manipulation and vexatious litigation, fueled by the emotional turmoil between the parties involved.
The bench also urged lawyers to refrain from advising clients to initiate frivolous proceedings as a pressure tactic. “Vexatious litigation in matrimonial disputes based on false allegations should be discouraged by courts and the bar,” the court noted.
More Read
Details of the Quashed Case
The case originated from a complaint by a woman against her estranged husband and his family, alleging that they sexually assaulted her minor daughter. The couple had been married since 2008, with matrimonial disputes arising in 2011, leading to various civil and criminal proceedings over the years. The POCSO complaint accused the husband of forcing the child to watch pornographic videos and subsequently assaulting her.
The wife further alleged that after the child stayed with her paternal uncle and aunt in Meerut, the uncle also assaulted her. The grandmother and aunt were accused of physical assault and threats. However, the Supreme Court found the allegations vague and unsupported by specific factual details, noting the lack of medical evidence to substantiate such serious claims.
Supreme Court’s Verdict
The Supreme Court observed that the complaint lacked details about the timing and specifics of the alleged incidents. The bench pointed out that the allegations only surfaced after years of litigation and multiple cases between the parties. The similarity in the statements made by the mother and the child suggested possible tutoring.
More Read
The absence of medical evidence was deemed significant. The court highlighted that no medical records were presented to substantiate the alleged injuries, particularly the serious allegation involving a hammer handle.
Ultimately, the court quashed the High Court’s order and dismissed the complaint, emphasizing that its decision was specific to the facts of this case and should not undermine the gravity of genuine sexual offence cases.
The husband and his family were represented by advocates L.S. Chaudhary, Ajay Chaudhary, Bharat Chaudhary, Vinita, Monika Chaudhary, Pratima Vishwakarma, Anjale Patel, and Sanjeev Malhotra, while the respondents were represented by Vijendra Singh, Apurva Singh, Ashwin Lakra, and Nitesh Ranjan.
[Read Judgement]
