Supreme Court’s Firm Stance Against Cybercrime
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, took a decisive stand against cybercriminals involved in investment frauds, dismissing a writ petition from Manoj Kumar Singh, who is accused of such activities. The Chief Justice labeled these offenders as “parasites” who exploit innocent investors by deceitful means.
Case Dismissed with Directives for Further Action
The Bench, comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana, declined to entertain the writ petition against the State of Bihar and others, indicating that cybercrime necessitates a stringent legal approach. The Court emphasized the need for such perpetrators to be incarcerated to protect societal interests. It was noted that these crimes are widespread across India, with money being taken from victims in various states, including Gujarat and Mumbai.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court directed the petitioner to seek relief from the High Court, underscoring that no substantial grounds were presented to maintain the writ petition.
Previous Rulings and Ongoing Investigations
In a related context, a previous ruling by a Bench including Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi had prohibited the granting of bail to individuals accused of defrauding a 72-year-old advocate of ₹3.29 crore through a digital arrest scam. This decision was characterized as “unusual orders,” reflecting the Court’s unwavering resolve to combat cybercrime.
Supreme Court’s Proactive Measures Against Digital Arrest Scams
Since October 2025, the Supreme Court has been actively engaged in addressing the burgeoning issue of cybercrime through a suo motu proceeding. This action stemmed from a complaint by a 73-year-old woman in Ambala, Haryana, who was allegedly defrauded of over ₹1 crore by scammers utilizing forged Supreme Court documents to manipulate her into a digital arrest scenario.
More Read
In December 2025, a Bench led by CJI Surya Kant instructed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to lead a comprehensive national investigation into these digital arrest scams. These scams typically involve fraudsters impersonating law enforcement or judicial authorities to extort money from victims under the pretense of avoiding arrest. The Court also directed the states of Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand, and Haryana to facilitate CBI investigations, ensuring that jurisdictional boundaries do not impede the process.
