The Calcutta High Court recently scrutinized the decision by Kolkata police to close Red Road and neighboring streets in preparation for International Yoga Day. This event, scheduled for June 21, is set to feature Prime Minister Narendra Modi as the lead figure. The All India Lawyers Union has challenged the road closures, citing security concerns.
Judicial Concerns Over Road Closures
During the hearing, Justice Saugata Bhattacharya noted the apolitical nature of the Yoga Day event but expressed concerns over the unprecedented seven-day closure of the major thoroughfare. The Justice questioned why the Brigade Parade Ground, a spacious alternative, was not chosen for the celebration instead. The Bench highlighted that the current road closures create significant challenges for Bar members who need to access the High Court.
Alternative Arrangements Ordered
The court instructed the police to arrange alternative routes to ease the movement of lawyers and residents. This directive aims to ensure that individuals can access their workplaces despite the roadblocks. Post the June 21 event, the court mandated that police promptly reopen Red Road for public access.
Further Judicial Review Anticipated
Justice Bhattacharya emphasized that a deeper examination of the issue would occur after the submission of a formal response from authorities. The court also recommended the inclusion of the Ministry of Defence or the Eastern Command in the proceedings, given that the Red Road falls under Army jurisdiction.
The petitioners argued that the extent of the restrictions was excessive and resulted from a lack of thorough consideration by the authorities. They pointed out a recent instance where the use of Red Road for Eid prayers was denied due to claimed inconvenience, yet the same road is now closed for a prolonged period for Yoga Day festivities.
Counterarguments and Responses
Additional Advocate General Bilwadal Bhattacharya underscored the significance of holding the international event in Kolkata. In response, the court questioned whether relocating to Brigade Parade Ground would diminish the event’s importance. The court reiterated the necessity of facilitating alternative routes for all affected individuals during the road closure.
Senior Advocate Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya represented the petitioners, arguing for the reconsideration of the current traffic restrictions and advocating for a more balanced approach.
