The Supreme Court of India, on Monday, declined to entertain an oral request for action against Nazia Elahi Khan, a BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer, concerning her alleged derogatory comments about Prophet Muhammad. A bench comprising Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Sheel Nagu advised the concerned counsel to submit a formal petition instead.
Justice Amanullah emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures, stating, “Have faith in our system. Why cannot you file a petition and take it up? This is the problem. Every institution in the country is being shaken, and people take up short circuit methods.” He highlighted that sensitive issues should be addressed through appropriate legal channels without sensationalizing them.
Justice Amanullah further elaborated on the significance of addressing such matters locally first, saying, “In sensitive cases, you must understand the implications. If one person has done something unlawful, then localize it and pin him down. But do not sensationalize it. If still, it does not work, then come to us. We agree that the case is grave but take the lawful course and not a short circuit.”
As per reports from the Indian Express, authorities in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) have already filed two FIRs against Khan for her alleged remarks. During the court session, concerns were raised about the potential impact on communal harmony, to which Justice Amanullah reiterated the need for faith in the legal system.
Justice Amanullah’s comments underline the judiciary’s stance on ensuring that the legal process is respected and followed, especially in cases that carry the potential for societal discord. The court’s message is clear: legal channels exist to address grievances, and these should be the first course of action.
