The Supreme Court of India has highlighted the critical need for better facilities for female lawyers in courts and has proposed financial support mechanisms to assist young advocates during their formative years in practice. This significant development arose during a hearing led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana, in response to a petition by a collective of women advocates who practice across various courts nationwide.
Addressing the Needs of Women Lawyers
The petitioners emphasized the glaring lack of adequately equipped Bar rooms specifically designed for women lawyers. They underscored the absence of essential amenities in many courts, tribunals, and commissions, which hampers the accessibility and inclusiveness of women in the legal profession. The Supreme Court bench took these concerns seriously, noting that the conditions faced by women lawyers were more than mere inconveniences—they were barriers to equal participation and professional effectiveness.
Link to Constitutional Rights
The Court pointed out that such facilities are intrinsically linked to the right to live and work with dignity as enshrined in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The term “life” in Article 21 has been expansively interpreted to include conditions necessary for a dignified existence, and the Court emphasized that this must extend to ensuring proper facilities for women in the legal field.
Financial Support for Young Lawyers
In addition to infrastructure concerns, the Court turned its attention to the financial challenges faced by young advocates entering the profession. Recognizing that these hardships are gender-neutral but particularly severe for first-generation lawyers, the Court proposed the establishment of a Young Lawyers’ Professional Assistance Fund. This fund would be managed by jurisdictional High Courts or an independent body established by the government, aimed at providing monthly stipends to economically disadvantaged young advocates.
Proposed Funding Mechanisms
To finance this initiative, the Court suggested legislative measures to facilitate donations from successful senior lawyers, contributions from court fees, and a share of costs imposed in legal proceedings. The Court also recommended offering incentives such as tax exemptions or national awards to encourage contributions to the fund. The assistance provided would cover basic sustenance for the initial years of practice, gradually reducing as the lawyers gain stability.
More Read
Long-Term Vision
The Court’s proposal includes a vision where beneficiaries could repay the assistance in phased instalments once financially capable, thus creating a self-sustaining fund for future generations of lawyers. While these suggestions are preliminary, the Court clarified that they are intended to prompt discussion and not to limit stakeholders’ options.
The Court has issued notices to relevant parties, including the Attorney General of India, Advocates General of States, and Standing Counsel for Union Territories, seeking their participation and assistance in this matter.
